Journal Home
Search for

Volume 37, Issue 1, Supplement, Pages S71-S77 (July 2009)


View previous. 14 of 19 View next.

Evaluation of AAP Guidelines for Cholesterol Screening in Youth: Project HeartBeat!

Mona A. Eissa, MD, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Eugene Wen, PhDb, Nicole L. Mihalopoulos, MD, MPHc, Jo Anne Grunbaum, EdDd, Darwin R. Labarthe, MD, MPH, PhDd

Background

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) criterion for screening for hypercholesterolemia in children is family history of hypercholesterolemia or cardiovascular disease or BMI ≥85th percentile. This paper aims to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of dyslipidemia screening using AAP criteria along with either family history or BMI.

Methods

Height, weight, plasma total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, and family history were obtained for 678 children aged 8, 11, and 14 years, enrolled from 1991 to 1993 in Project HeartBeat!. Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV screening of each lipid component using family history alone, BMI ≥85th percentile alone, or family history and/or BMI ≥85th percentile, were calculated using 2008 AAP criteria (total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglycerides ≥90th percentile; HDL-C <10th percentile).

Results

Sensitivity of detecting abnormal total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides using family history alone ranged from 38% to 43% and significantly increased to 54%–66% using family history and/or BMI. Specificity significantly decreased from approximately 65% to 52%, and there were no notable changes in PPV. In black children, cholesterol screening using the BMI ≥85th percentile criterion had higher sensitivity than when using the family history criterion. In nonblacks, family history and/or BMI ≥85th percentile had greater sensitivity than family history alone.

Conclusions

When the BMI screening criterion was used along with the family history criterion, sensitivity increased, specificity decreased, and PPV changed trivially for detection of dyslipidemia. Despite increased screening sensitivity by adding the BMI criterion, a clinically significant number of children still may be misclassified.

a University of Texas Medical School, Houston, Texas

b Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ottawa, Canada

c University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

d CDC, Atlanta, Georgia

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Mona A. Eissa, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin MSB #3.146A, Houston TX 77030

PII: S0749-3797(09)00218-9

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.04.008


View previous. 14 of 19 View next.