After-School Program Impact on Physical Activity and Fitness: A Meta-Analysis
published online 13 April 2009.
Context
The majority of children do not participate in sufficient amounts of daily, health-enhancing physical activity. One strategy to increase activity is to promote it within the after-school setting. Although promising, the effectiveness of this strategy is unclear. A systematic review was performed summarizing the research conducted to date regarding the effectiveness of after-school programs in increasing physical activity.
Evidence acquisition
Databases, journals, and review articles were searched for articles published between 1980 and February 2008. Meta-analysis was conducted during July of 2008. Included articles had the following characteristics: findings specific to an after-school intervention in the school setting; subjects aged ≤18 years; an intervention component designed to promote physical activity; outcome measures of physical activity, related constructs, and/or physical fitness. Study outcomes were distilled into six domains: physical activity, physical fitness, body composition, blood lipids, psychosocial constructs, and sedentary activities. Effect sizes (Hedge's g) were calculated within and across studies for each domain, separately.
Evidence synthesis
Of the 797 articles found, 13 unique articles describing findings from 11 after-school interventions were reviewed. Although physical activity was a primary component of all the tested interventions, only eight studies measured physical activity. From the six domains, positive effect sizes were demonstrated for physical activity (0.44 [95% CI=0.28–0.60]); physical fitness (0.16 [95% CI=0.01–0.30]); body composition (0.07 [95% CI=0.03–0.12]); and blood lipids (0.20 [95% CI=0.06–0.33]).
Conclusions
The limited evidence suggests that after-school programs can improve physical activity levels and other health-related aspects. Additional studies are required that provide greater attention to theoretical rationale, levels of implementation, and measures of physical activity within and outside the intervention.
aDepartment of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
bDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
cSchool of Health Physical Education and Recreation, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Michael W. Beets, MPH, PhD, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Exercise Science, 921 Assembly Street, Public Health Research Building, Room 131, Columbia SC 29208
ABSTRACT