Journal Home
Search for

Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 142-149 (February 2009)


View previous. 9 of 15 View next.

Telephone Counseling for Physical Activity and Diet in Primary Care Patients

Elizabeth Eakin, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Marina Reeves, PhDa, Sheleigh Lawler, PhDa, Nick Graves, PhDb, Brian Oldenburg, PhDc, Chris Del Mar, MBBChird, Ken Wilke, MBBSe, Elizabeth Winkler, PhDa, Adrian Barnett, PhDb

published online 08 December 2008.

Background

The delivery of effective interventions to assist patients to improve their physical activity and dietary behaviors is a challenge in the busy primary care setting.

Design

Cluster RCT with practices randomized to telephone counseling intervention or usual care. Data collection took place from February 2005 to November 2007, with analysis from December 2007 to April 2008.

Setting/participants

Four-hundred thirty-four adult patients with type 2 diabetes or hypertension (mean age=58.2 [SD=11.8]; 61% female; mean BMI=31.1 [SD=6.8]) from a disadvantaged community were recruited from ten primary care practices.

Intervention

Twelve-month telephone counseling intervention.

Main outcome measures

Physical activity and dietary intake were assessed by self-report at baseline, 4, and 12 months.

Results

At 12 months, patients in both groups increased moderate-to-vigorous physical activity by a mean of 78 minutes per week (SE=10). Significant intervention effects (telephone counseling minus usual care) were observed for: calories from total fat (decrease of 1.17%; p<0.007), energy from saturated fat (decrease of 0.97%; p<0.007), vegetable intake (increase of 0.71 servings; p<0.039), fruit intake (increase of 0.30 servings; p<0.001), and grams of fiber (increase of 2.23 g; p<0.001).

Conclusions

The study targeted a challenging primary care patient sample and, using a telephone-delivered intervention, demonstrated modest improvements in diet and in physical activity. Results suggest that telephone counseling is a feasible means of delivering lifestyle intervention to primary care patients with chronic conditions—patients whose need for ongoing support for lifestyle change is often beyond the capacity of primary healthcare practitioners.

Trial registration

Australian Clinical Trials Registry, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, www.anzctr.org.au/default.aspx, ACTRN012607000195459.

a Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

b Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

c Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

d Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

e Logan Area Division of General Practice, Logan, Queensland, Australia

Corresponding Author InformationAddress corresponding and reprint requests to: Elizabeth Eakin, PhD, Deputy Director, Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, Level 3, Public Health Building, The University of Queensland, Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006 Australia

PII: S0749-3797(08)00897-0

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.042


View previous. 9 of 15 View next.