Journal Home
Search for

Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 29-34 (January 2009)


View previous. 6 of 15 View next.

Physical Activity in Women: Effects of a Self-Regulation Intervention

Gertraud Stadler, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Gabriele Oettingen, PhDbc, Peter M. Gollwitzer, PhDbd

published online 03 November 2008.

Background

A physically active lifestyle during midlife is critical to the maintenance of high physical functioning. This study tested whether an intervention that combined information with cognitive–behavioral strategies had a better effect on women's physical activity than an information-only intervention.

Design

A 4-month longitudinal RCT comparing two brief interventions was conducted between July 2003 and September 2004. Analyses were completed in June 2008.

Setting and participants

256 women aged 30–50 years in a large metropolitan area in Germany.

Intervention

The study compared a health information intervention with an information + self-regulation intervention. All participants received the same information intervention; participants in the information + self-regulation group additionally learned a technique that integrates mental contrasting with implementation intentions.

Main outcome measures

Self-reported minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week.

Results

Participants in the information + self-regulation group were twice as physically active (i.e., nearly 1 hour more per week) as participants in the information group. This difference appeared as early as the first week after intervention and was maintained over the course of the 4 months. Participants in the information group slightly increased their baseline physical activity after intervention.

Conclusions

Women who learned a self-regulation technique during an information session were substantially more active than women who participated in only the information session. The self-regulation technique should be tested further as a tool for increasing the impact of interventions on behavioral change.

a Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York

b Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York

c Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

d Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Gertraud Stadler, PhD, Columbia University, Psychology Department, 200D Schermerhorn Hall, 1190 Amsterdam Avenue, New York NY 10027

 The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at www.ajpm-online.net; 1 unit of Category-1 CME credit is also available, with details on the website.

PII: S0749-3797(08)00831-3

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.021


View previous. 6 of 15 View next.