Journal Home
Search for

Volume 35, Issue 1, Supplement, Pages S67-S74 (July 2008)


View previous. 13 of 14 View next.

Interventions to Increase Recommendation and Delivery of Screening for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancers by Healthcare Providers: Systematic Reviews of Provider Assessment and Feedback and Provider Incentives

Task Force on Community Preventive ServicesSusan A. Sabatino, MD, MPHbCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Nancy Habarta, MPHa, Roy C. Baron, MD, MPHa, Ralph J. Coates, PhDb, Barbara K. Rimer, DrPHc, Jon Kerner, PhDd, Steven S. Coughlin, PhD, MPHb, Geetika P. Kalra, MPHa, Sajal Chattopadhyay, PhDa

Abstract

Most major medical organizations recommend routine screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Screening can lead to early detection of these cancers, resulting in reduced mortality. Yet not all people who should be screened are screened, either regularly or, in some cases, ever. This report presents results of systematic reviews of effectiveness, applicability, economic efficiency, barriers to implementation, and other harms or benefits of two provider-directed intervention approaches to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. These approaches, provider assessment and feedback, and provider incentives encourage providers to deliver screening services at appropriate intervals. Evidence in these reviews indicates that provider assessment and feedback interventions can effectively increase screening by mammography, Pap test, and fecal occult blood test. Health plans, healthcare systems, and cancer control coalitions should consider such evidence-based findings when implementing interventions to increase screening use. Evidence was insufficient to determine the effectiveness of provider incentives in increasing use of any of these tests. Specific areas for further research are suggested in this report, including the need for additional research to determine whether provider incentives are effective in increasing use of any of these screening tests, and whether assessment and feedback interventions are effective in increasing other tests for colorectal cancer (i.e., flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or double-contrast barium enema).

a CDC Community Guide Branch, National Center for Health Marketing, Atlanta, Georgia

b CDC Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Atlanta, Georgia

c University of North Carolina School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

d National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Susan Sabatino, MD, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, MS K-53, Atlanta GA 30333.

 Author affiliations are shown at the time the research was conducted.

 The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed at the front of this supplement and at www.thecommunityguide.org.

PII: S0749-3797(08)00329-2

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.008


View previous. 13 of 14 View next.