Journal Home
Search for

Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 47-54 (July 2008)


View previous. 9 of 15 View next.

Prevalence, Family History, and Prevention of Reported Osteoporosis in U.S. Women

Julie Robitaille, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Paula W. Yoon, ScDb, Cynthia A. Moore, MDb, Tiebin Liu, MSPHb, Margarita Irizarry-Delacruz, MPHb, Anne C. Looker, PhDc, Muin J. Khoury, MDb

Background

Osteoporosis is a major public health concern and has been associated with a family history positive for the condition. However, data on the behaviors of individuals with such a family history are scarce. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship between the prevalence of reported physician-diagnosed osteoporosis and family history in a representative sample of U.S. women, examine whether osteoporosis risk factors account for this relationship, and evaluate the likelihood that women at high risk of osteoporosis due to family history report preventive behaviors.

Methods

The prevalence of reported osteoporosis was estimated in 8073 women aged ≥20 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004. Information on osteoporosis in first-degree relatives and grandparents was obtained during interviews.

Results

The prevalence of osteoporosis in participants was 7.94%. In 19.8% of them, a positive family history was reported and was significantly and independently associated with osteoporosis (AOR 2.35, 95% CI=1.87, 2.96). This association was stronger when two or more relatives were affected (AOR 8.48, 95% CI=4.50, 15.99). After stratification by age, the association was observed only in women aged ≥35 years. Women with a family history of osteoporosis were more likely than those with none to report preventive behavior, such as taking supplements of calcium, vitamin D, or both; physical activity; and estrogen use.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that family history is a significant, independent risk factor for osteoporosis in U.S. women aged ≥35 years. Further studies are warranted to evaluate family history as a convenient and inexpensive tool for identifying women at risk of osteoporosis and for promoting the adoption of preventive behaviors.

a CDC, the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Atlanta, Georgia

b National Office of Public Health Genomics, Atlanta, Georgia

c National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Julie Robitaille, PhD, Institute of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods, Pavillon des Services, Room 2749, Laval University, 2440 Hochelaga Boulevard, Québec City, Québec, Canada G1V 0A6.

PII: S0749-3797(08)00314-0

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.027


View previous. 9 of 15 View next.