Journal Home
Search for

Volume 34, Issue 6, Supplement, Pages S222-S229 (June 2008)


View previous. 11 of 17 View next.

Overview of Formative, Process, and Outcome Evaluation Methods Used in the VERB Campaign

Judy M. Berkowitz, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Marian Huhman, PhDa, Carrie D. Heitzler, MPHb, Lance D. Potter, MAc, Mary Jo Nolin, PhDc, Stephen W. Banspach, PhDa

Abstract

Evaluation was an integral part of the VERB campaign. This paper describes the array of evaluation methods used to support the development, implementation, and assessment of campaign activities. The evaluation of VERB consisted of formative, process, and outcome evaluations and involved both qualitative and quantitative methods. Formative evaluation allowed staff to test ideas for messages and to gauge their appropriateness for the intended audiences. Process evaluation allowed staff to test and monitor the fidelity of the campaign's implementation to objectives and to make changes while the campaign was under way. Outcome evaluation allowed staff to determine the campaign's effects on the target audience. Because a comprehensive approach was used, which included formative and process evaluation, the VERB team's ability to interpret the results of the outcome evaluation was enhanced.

a National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia

b School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

c Westat, Rockville, Maryland

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Judy M. Berkowitz, PhD, CDC Division of Reproductive Health, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS K-50, Atlanta GA 30341.

PII: S0749-3797(08)00255-9

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.008


View previous. 11 of 17 View next.