Journal Home
Search for

Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 143-152.e3 (February 2008)


View previous. 10 of 14 View next.

Primary Care Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Misuse: Ranking Its Health Impact and Cost Effectiveness

Leif I. Solberg, MDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Michael V. Maciosek, PhD, Nichol M. Edwards, MS

Background

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse. This study was designed to develop a standardized rating for the clinically preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature from 1992 through 2004 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials and cost-effectiveness studies was completed in 2005. Clinically preventable burden (CPB) was calculated as the product of effectiveness times the alcohol-attributable fraction of both mortality and morbidity (measured in quality-adjusted life years or QALYs), for all relevant conditions. Cost effectiveness from both the societal perspective and the health-system perspective was estimated. These analyses were completed in 2006.

Results

The calculated CPB was 176,000 QALYs saved over the lifetime of a birth cohort of 4,000,000, with a range in sensitivity analysis from −43% to +94% (primarily due to variation in estimates of effectiveness). Screening and brief counseling was cost-saving from the societal perspective and had a cost-effectiveness ratio of $1755/QALY saved from the health-system perspective. Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving.

Conclusions

These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using standardized methods. Since current levels of delivery are the lowest of comparably ranked services, this service deserves special attention by clinicians and care delivery systems.

HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Leif I. Solberg, MD, HealthPartners Research Foundation, P.O. Box 1524, MS 21111R, Minneapolis MN 55440-1524.

 The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at www.ajpm-online.net; 1 unit of Category-1 CME credit is also available, with details on the website.

PII: S0749-3797(07)00686-1

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.035


View previous. 10 of 14 View next.