Journal Home
Search for

Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 134-137 (February 2008)


View previous. 8 of 14 View next.

Cueing Prenatal Providers: Effects on Discussions of Intimate Partner Violence

Sophia H. Calderón, BAa, Paul Gilbert, ScMa, Rebecca Jackson, MDc, Michael A. Kohn, MD, MPPb, Barbara Gerbert, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Background

Intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy poses a significant health risk to the mother and developing fetus. Practice guidelines recommend that prenatal providers screen for and counsel their patients about IPV, yet many physicians express reluctance or discomfort regarding such discussions. The Health in Pregnancy (HIP) computer program was designed to improve prenatal providers’ counseling about behavioral risks.

Methods

English-speaking women 18 years or older, less than 26-weeks pregnant, and receiving prenatal care at one of the five participating clinics in the San Francisco area, were randomized in parallel groups in a controlled trial (June 2006–present; data analyzed June 2007). Participants reporting one or more risks were randomized to intervention or control in stratified blocks. Providers received summary “cueing sheets” alerting them to their patient’s risk(s) and suggesting counseling statements.

Results

Thirteen percent (37/286) of the sample reported current IPV. Provider cueing resulted in 85% of the IPV-intervention group reporting discussions with their provider, compared to 23.5% of the control group (p<0.001).

Conclusions

IPV discussions were influenced strongly by cueing providers. Provider cueing is an effective and appropriate adjunct to routine risk counseling in prenatal care.

a Division of Behavioral Sciences, Professionalism, and Ethics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

b Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

c Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Barbara Gerbert, PhD, Professor, Division of Behavioral Sciences, Professionalism, and Ethics, University of California San Francisco, 350 Parnassus Avenue, Suite 905, San Francisco CA 94117.

PII: S0749-3797(07)00649-6

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.029


View previous. 8 of 14 View next.