Journal Home
Search for

Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 54-60 (January 2008)


View previous. 9 of 16 View next.

The Impact of Smoking-Cessation Intervention by Multiple Health Professionals

Lawrence C. An, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Steven S. Foldes, PhDd, Nina L. Alesci, PhDd, James H. Bluhm, MPHd, Patricia C. Bland, MAd, Michael E. Davern, PhDb, Barbara A. Schillo, PhDc, Jasjit S. Ahluwalia, MD, MPHa, Marc W. Manley, MD, MPHd

Background

Smokers have contact with many different types of health professionals. The impact of tobacco intervention by multiple types of heath professionals is not known.

Methods and Materials

As part of the 2003 Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey, smokers (n=1723) reported on tobacco treatment by medical doctors, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, or other health professionals. This analysis examined: (1) smokers’ report of tobacco intervention by different types of healthcare providers, (2) the proportion of smokers who report intervention by multiple provider types, and (3) the relationship between smokers’ report of intervention by multiple provider types and readiness to quit, quit attempts, and recent quitting.

Results

Among past-year smokers, 65% had visits with two or more types of health professionals. Among smokers who visited health professionals (n=1523), only 34% reported being asked about smoking by two or more types of professionals. Among current smokers (n=1324), advice or assistance from more than one type of professional was uncommon (26% and 7%, respectively). Being asked about smoking by two or more types of professionals substantially increased the odds of recent quitting (OR=2.37; 95% CI=1.15–4.88). Among current smokers, being advised to quit by two or more types of professionals increased the odds of having made a quit attempt in the past year (OR=2.92; 95% CI=1.56–5.45) or intending to quit in the next 6 months (OR=2.17; 95% CI=1.10–4.29).

Conclusions

Smoking-cessation interventions by more than one type of health professional have the potential to substantially increase quitting and readiness to quit in the population.

a Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota, Eagan, Minnesota

b Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Eagan, Minnesota

c Clearway Minnesota, Minneapolis, Eagan, Minnesota

d Center for Prevention, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, Eagan, Minnesota

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Lawrence C. An, MD, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota, Mayo Building, Mail Code 741, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis MN 55455.

PII: S0749-3797(07)00613-7

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.019


View previous. 9 of 16 View next.