Journal Home
Search for

Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 276-280 (October 2007)


View previous. 3 of 12 View next.

Long-Term Effects of a Physical Activity Intervention in High School Girls

Russell R. Pate, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Ruth Saunders, PhDb, Rod K. Dishman, PhDd, Cheryl Addy, PhDc, Marsha Dowda, DrPHa, Dianne S. Ward, EdDe

Background

Physical activity (PA) decreases during childhood and adolescence, and PA levels are significantly lower in females than males, particularly during adolescence. Schools are attractive settings in which to implement interventions designed to promote PA in girls and young women, but few studies have tested the sustained effects of such interventions.

Design

Cross-sectional. Data were collected in 2002–2003 and analyzed in 2006–2007.

Setting/participants

1594 adolescent girls in 22 high schools.

Intervention

The intervention, Lifestyle Education for Activity Program (LEAP), was designed to increase physical activity in 9th-grade girls through two channels: changes in instructional practices and changes in the school environment. This study (LEAP 2) examined the extent to which effects of the intervention were maintained when the girls were in the 12th grade.

Main outcome measures

Number of 30-minute blocks per day of vigorous physical activity.

Results

Girls in the intervention schools that most fully implemented and maintained the intervention were more likely than girls in the other schools to participate in an average of one or more blocks of vigorous physical activity per day (p=0.04, odds ratio=1.49, 95% confidence interval=1.01–2.20).

Conclusions

A comprehensive physical activity intervention that is fully implemented and maintained can increase participation in vigorous physical activity by high school girls.

a Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina

b Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina

c Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina

d Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

e Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Russell R. Pate, PhD, University of South Carolina, Department of Exercise Science, 921 Assembly St., Columbia SC 29208.

PII: S0749-3797(07)00367-4

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.06.005


View previous. 3 of 12 View next.