Journal Home
Search for

Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 353-357 (October 2007)


View previous. 12 of 12

Creating a Model Program for Influenza Surveillance in California: Results from the 2005–2006 Influenza Season

Janice K. Louie, MD, MPHaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, David P. Schnurr, PhDa, Hugo F. Guevara, MSa, Somayeh Honarmand, MSa, Michele Cheung, MD, MPHb, David Cottam, BAa, Elaine Yeh, BAa, Lauren Wold, BSa, Erica J. Boston, BSa, Janet Tang, MPHa, Kate C. Cummings, MPHa, Richard M. Donovan, PhDa, Robert Schechter, MD, MPHa, Jon Rosenberg, MDa, Lawrence J. Walter, MAc, John A. Chapman, BSc, Paul R. Brenner, BAd, Roger P. Baxter, MDc, Carol A. Glaser, MD, DVMa

Background

Influenza surveillance is valuable for monitoring trends in influenza-related morbidity and mortality. Using the 2005–2006 influenza season as an example, this paper describes a comprehensive influenza surveillance program used by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH).

Methods

Data collected from patients evaluated for acute respiratory illness in a given week were reported and summarized the following week, including (1) electronic hospital pneumonia and influenza admission and antiviral usage records from Kaiser Permanente, (2) sentinel provider influenza-like illness (ILI) reports, (3) severe pediatric influenza case reports (e.g., children either hospitalized in intensive care or expired), (4) school clinic ILI evaluations, and (5) positive influenza test results from a network of academic, hospital, commercial, and public health laboratories and the state CDPH Viral and Rickettsial Disease Laboratory.

Results

Influenza activity in California in the 2005–2006 season was moderate in severity; all clinical and laboratory markers rose and fell consistently. Extensive laboratory characterization identified the predominant circulating virus strain as A/California/7/2004(H3N2), which was a component of the 2005–2006 influenza vaccine; 96% of samples tested showed adamantane resistance.

Conclusions

By using multiple, complementary surveillance methods coupled with a strong laboratory component, the CDPH has developed a simple, flexible, stable, and widely accepted influenza surveillance system that can monitor trends in statewide influenza activity, ascertain the correlation between circulating strains with vaccine strains, and assist with detection of new strain variants. The methods described can serve as a model for influenza surveillance in other states.

a California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California

b County of Orange Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, California

c Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California

d Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Janice K. Louie, MD, MPH, California Department of Health Services, Viral and Rickettsial Disease Laboratory, 850 Marina Bay Parkway, Richmond CA 94804.

PII: S0749-3797(07)00364-9

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.008


View previous. 12 of 12