Journal Home
Search for

Volume 33, Issue 2, Supplement, Pages S130-S143 (August 2007)


View previous. 13 of 14 View next.

School-Based Interventions for Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior: Update of a Meta-Analysis

Sandra Jo Wilson, PhDCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Mark W. Lipsey, PhD

Background

Research about the effectiveness of school-based psychosocial prevention programs for reducing aggressive and disruptive behavior was synthesized using meta-analysis. This work updated previous work by the authors and further investigated which program and student characteristics were associated with the most positive outcomes.

Methods

Two hundred forty-nine experimental and quasi-experimental studies of school-based programs with outcomes representing aggressive and/or disruptive behavior were obtained. Effect sizes and study characteristics were coded from these studies and analyzed.

Results

Positive overall intervention effects were found on aggressive and disruptive behavior and other relevant outcomes. The most common and most effective approaches were universal programs and targeted programs for selected/indicated children. The mean effect sizes for these types of programs represent a decrease in aggressive/disruptive behavior that is likely to be of practical significance to schools. Multicomponent comprehensive programs did not show significant effects and those for special schools or classrooms were marginal. Different treatment modalities (e.g., behavioral, cognitive, social skills) produced largely similar effects. Effects were larger for better-implemented programs and those involving students at higher risk for aggressive behavior.

Conclusions

Schools seeking prevention programs may choose from a range of effective programs with some confidence that whatever they pick will be effective. Without the researcher involvement that characterizes the great majority of programs in this meta-analysis, schools might be well-advised to give priority to those that will be easiest to implement well in their settings.

Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Sandra Jo Wilson, PhD, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, 1207 18th Ave. South, Nashville TN 37212.

PII: S0749-3797(07)00236-X

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.011


View previous. 13 of 14 View next.