Journal Home
Search for

Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 114-120 (August 2007)


View previous. 6 of 17 View next.

A Complex Web of Risks for Metabolic Syndrome: Race/Ethnicity, Economics, and Gender

Pamela J. Salsberry, PhDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Elizabeth Corwin, PhDa, Patricia B. Reagan, PhDb

Background

Metabolic syndrome is a recognizable clinical cluster of risks known to be associated in combination and independently with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Identifying and treating metabolic syndrome is one promising strategy to reduce CVD. The intersection of race/ethnicity, gender, and economic status complicates our understanding of who is at risk for metabolic syndrome, but understanding this social patterning is important for the development of targeted interventions. This study examines the relationship between metabolic syndrome (and the underlying contributing risk factors) and race/ethnicity, economic status, and gender.

Methods

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data collected from 1999 through 2002 were used; analysis was completed in 2006–2007. Metabolic syndrome was defined using the Adult Treatment Panel III definition. Economic status was measured using income as a percentage of the poverty level. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and each of its contributing risk factors were determined by race/ethnicity and economic group. Logistic regressions were estimated. All analyses were stratified by gender.

Results

Economic effects were seen for women, but not men. Women in the lowest economic group were more likely to be at risk in four of the five risk categories when compared with women in the highest economic group. Differences in the contributing risk profiles for metabolic syndrome were seen by race/ethnicity.

Conclusions

Strategies to reduce CVD must be built on a clear understanding of the differences in contributing risk factors for metabolic syndrome across subgroups. The findings from this study provide further information to guide the targeting of these strategies.

a College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

b Department of Economics and Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Pamela Salsberry, PhD, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus OH 43210.

PII: S0749-3797(07)00231-0

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.017


View previous. 6 of 17 View next.