Pros and cons of proposed interventions to promote healthy eating
Abstract
The increased prevalence and costs associated with the obesity epidemic have made preventive efforts a public health priority. Public health has historically relied on a series of targeted regulations, taxes, and education efforts to curb epidemics, and will rely on similar strategies to combat obesity. We argue that interventions targeted at youth are relatively easy to justify on economic grounds due to the additional protections that this group requires, but that justification for government interventions aimed at curbing obesity among adults requires additional evidence that private markets are not functioning properly. We then present seven proposed intervention strategies to promote healthy eating, and use an economic framework to discuss the relative merits of the interventions. This evaluation will allow policymakers to make more informed decisions concerning the relative merits of these strategies in combating the obesity epidemic.
aHealth, Social and Economics Research, RTI International (Finkelstein), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
bUniversity of Minnesota (French), Minneapolis, Minnesota
cEconomic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (Variyam), Washington, DC
dUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Haines), Chapel Hill, North Carolina
ePartnership to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living, Boston, Massachusetts
Address correspondence to: Eric Finkelstein, PhD, MHA, Research Economist; Health, Social and Economics Research, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Hobbs Building, Research Triangle Park NC 27709-2194. Address reprint requests to: Laura Simonds, The Partnership to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living, 44 School Street, Suite 325, Boston MA 02108