American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 37, Issue 4 , Pages 360-371, October 2009

Effectiveness of Multicomponent Programs with Community Mobilization for Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving

  • Ruth A. Shults, PhD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Ruth A. Shults, PhD, MPH, Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop F-62, Atlanta GA 30341
  • ,
  • Randy W. Elder, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health Communication and Marketing, National Center for Health Marketing, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • James L. Nichols, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Office of Research and Traffic Records, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • David A. Sleet, PhD, FAAHB

      Affiliations

    • Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Richard Compton, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Office of Research and Traffic Records, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Sajal K. Chattopadhyay, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Health Communication and Marketing, National Center for Health Marketing, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
  • ,
  • Task Force on Community Preventive Services

Abstract 

A systematic review was conducted to determine the effectiveness and economic efficiency of multicomponent programs with community mobilization for reducing alcohol-impaired driving. The review was conducted for the Guide to Community Preventive Services (Community Guide). Six studies of programs qualified for the review. Programs addressed a wide range of alcohol-related concerns in addition to alcohol-impaired driving.

The programs used various crash-related outcomes to measure their effectiveness. Two studies examined fatal crashes and reported declines of 9% and 42%; one study examined injury crashes and reported a decline of 10%; another study examined crashes among young drivers aged 16–20 years and reported a decline of 45%; and one study examined single-vehicle late-night and weekend crashes among young male drivers and reported no change. The sixth study examined injury crashes among underage drivers and reported small net reductions. Because the actual numbers of crashes were not reported, percentage change could not be calculated.

According to Community Guide rules of evidence, the studies reviewed here provided strong evidence that carefully planned, well-executed multicomponent programs, when implemented in conjunction with community mobilization efforts, are effective in reducing alcohol-related crashes. Three studies reported economic evidence that suggests that such programs produce cost savings. The multicomponent programs generally included a combination of efforts to limit access to alcohol (particularly among youth), responsible beverage service training, sobriety checkpoints or other well-defined enforcement efforts, public education, and media advocacy designed to gain the support of both policymakers and the general public for reducing alcohol-impaired driving.

 

PII: S0749-3797(09)00488-7

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.005

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 37, Issue 4 , Pages 360-371, October 2009