American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 231-234, September 2009

Obstetrician–Gynecologists' Practices and Perceived Knowledge Regarding Immunization

  • Michael L. Power, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Department, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Michael L. Power, PhD, Research Department, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 409 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20024
  • ,
  • Meaghan A. Leddy, MA

      Affiliations

    • Research Department, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC
    • Psychology Department, American University, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Britta L. Anderson, BA

      Affiliations

    • Research Department, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC
    • Psychology Department, American University, Washington, DC
  • ,
  • Stanley A. Gall, MD

      Affiliations

    • Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
  • ,
  • Bernard Gonik, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
  • ,
  • Jay Schulkin, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Department, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC

published online 13 July 2009.

Background

Obstetrician–gynecologists can play a key role in providing appropriate vaccinations to women of childbearing age.

Purpose

This study investigated immunization knowledge and practices, and opinions concerning potential barriers to immunization, among obstetrician-gynecologists.

Methods

In 2007, surveys were sent to Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members, a representative sample of practicing Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 394 responded (51.2%). Data analysis was completed in 2008.

Results

Most responding obstetrician–gynecologists disagreed that “routine screening for vaccine-preventable diseases falls outside of the routine practice of an ob/gyn.” A majority (78.7%) stock and administer at least some vaccines. Among those who stock vaccines, 91.0% stock the human papillomavirus vaccine, and 66.8% stock the influenza vaccine. All other vaccines were stocked by <30% of practices that stock vaccines. A majority of physicians agreed that financial factors (e.g., inadequate reimbursement) were barriers to vaccine administration. Most were aware that the influenza (89.8%); hepatitis B (64.0%); and tetanus, diptheria, pertussis (58.6%) vaccines are safe to administer during pregnancy, and that the measles, mumps, rubella (97.5%); and varicella (92.9%) vaccines are not. Most (84.5%) were in concordance with recommendations that all pregnant women should receive the influenza vaccine. A majority believed their immunization training was less than adequate and believed their practice would benefit from continuing medical education courses.

Conclusions

Immunization is an important part of women's health care and has been, at least partially, incorporated into obstetrician–gynecologist practice. Financial burdens and knowledge regarding vaccine recommendations remain barriers to vaccine administration. Additional training and professional information may benefit obstetric–gynecologic practice.

 

PII: S0749-3797(09)00392-4

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.019

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 37, Issue 3 , Pages 231-234, September 2009