American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 317-322, March 2010

Physical Violence Against U.S. Women Around the Time of Pregnancy, 2004–2007

  • Susan Y. Chu, PhD, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Susan Y. Chu, PhD, MSPH, Division of Reproductive Health, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop K-23, Atlanta GA 30341
  • ,
  • Mary M. Goodwin, MPA, MA
  • ,
  • Denise V. D'Angelo, MPH

Background

Previous research shows that the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) around the time of pregnancy varies from 4% to 9%, but no studies have distinguished between abuse rates by former versus current partners.

Purpose

This study aims to estimate the prevalence of IPV among U.S. women shortly before and during pregnancy and to compare the rates and predictors of abuse perpetrated by current partners with the rates and predictors of abuse perpetrated by former partners.

Methods

Using data from 27 states and New York City, the prevalence of physical abuse by current and former intimate male partners was estimated among 134,955 women who delivered a singleton, full-term infant in 2004–2007. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the demographic, pregnancy-related, and stress factors that predicted the risk of IPV.

Results

Prevalence of IPV from either a former or current partner was 5.3% before and 3.6% during pregnancy. Prevalence of abuse by a former partner was consistently higher than the prevalence of abuse by a current partner. The three strongest predictors of IPV during pregnancy were the woman's partner not wanting the pregnancy (current: AOR=3.47, 95% CI=3.13, 3.85; former: AOR=3.22, 95% CI=2.90, 3.76); having had a recent divorce or separation (current: AOR=3.23, 95% CI=2.92, 3.58; former: AOR=3.54, 95% CI=3.20, 3.91); and being close to someone having a drug or alcohol problem (current: AOR=3.05, 95% CI=2.78, 3.36; former: AOR=2.97, 95% CI=2.70, 3.27). Maternal characteristics (age, education, race, marital status, woman did not want the pregnancy) were less important predictors.

Conclusions

Assessments of abuse should ask specifically about actions by both current and ex-partners.

 

PII: S0749-3797(09)00854-X

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.013

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 38, Issue 3 , Pages 317-322, March 2010