American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 167-177, February 2004

The tobacco industry's political efforts to derail the EPA report on ETS

  • Monique E Muggli, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Independent Tobacco Control Consultant (Muggli), St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
  • ,
  • Richard D Hurt, MD

      Affiliations

    • Mayo Clinic, Nicotine Dependence Center (Hurt), Rochester, Minnesota USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to: Richard D. Hurt, MD, Mayo Clinic, Nicotine Dependence Center, 200 First Street, S.W., Rochester MN 55905, USA.
  • ,
  • James Repace, MSc

      Affiliations

    • (Repace), Baltimore, Maryland USA

Abstract 

Abstract

Previously secret tobacco industry documents detailed a multifaceted approach of political strategies aimed to derail the 1993 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) risk assessment on environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). These pervasive strategies included the following: (1) lobbying the first Bush Administration to approve an executive order that would impose new risk assessment standards for federal agencies, thus delaying the release of the EPA report; (2) having the first Bush Administration transfer jurisdiction over ETS from the EPA to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), thus obviating the need for the release of the EPA report; and (3) applying enormous political pressure directly by alleging improper procedure and policy at EPA. Although some of the attempted strategies failed, the political pressure from Congressman Thomas Bliley (R-VA) was a success. This is the first report showing how a single member of Congress in conjunction with his staff, tobacco industry attorneys, and executives worked very aggressively to do the tobacco industry's bidding. These tactics successfully delayed the EPA risk assessment and placed a cloud over its validity that was not fully vindicated until December 2002 when the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the tobacco industry's suit against the EPA. The documents show that the industry will expend whatever effort is necessary to protect itself from public health policy that would adversely affect consumption of cigarettes and, therefore, profit.

 

PII: S0749-3797(03)00325-8

doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2003.10.015

American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume 26, Issue 2 , Pages 167-177, February 2004